New York has agreed to pay $24 million to settle civil litigation brought by the family of Robert L. Brooks Sr., who died after correction officers beat him at Marcy Correctional Facility in December 2024.
The settlement resolves federal civil-rights litigation and a separate state action arising from Brooks’ death. It is a civil resolution and is separate from the criminal cases brought against the officers involved.
The case is also an important reminder that incarcerated people retain constitutional protections. A prison sentence does not authorize correction officers to use excessive force, disregard serious medical needs, ignore known threats, or fail to intervene when another officer unlawfully harms someone in custody.
What Happened to Robert Brooks?
Brooks, 43, was transferred from Mohawk Correctional Facility to Marcy Correctional Facility in Oneida County on December 9, 2024.
According to the New York Attorney General’s Office, Brooks was handcuffed with his hands behind his back when officers took him into a medical examination room. Body-worn cameras carried by four officers recorded portions of what happened next.
The footage showed correction officers striking Brooks while he was restrained. He was taken to a hospital and pronounced dead during the early morning of December 10.
Brooks’ death was attributed to asphyxia caused by neck compression, with other injuries reportedly contributing. His manner of death was classified as a homicide.
A homicide classification is a medical determination that a death resulted from another person’s actions. It does not independently establish criminal guilt or civil liability. Those questions are decided through the criminal and civil legal systems.
For a free legal consultation, call 800-593-3443
What Did the Brooks Family’s Lawsuits Allege?
Brooks’ son filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit against more than a dozen correction officers, prison officials, and the commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision.
The federal complaint alleged that officers used excessive force against Brooks while he was handcuffed and unable to defend himself. It also alleged that other employees witnessed the assault without intervening or providing appropriate assistance.
The claims reportedly included:
- Excessive force
- Failure to intervene
- Deliberate indifference to medical needs
- Failure to protect
- Supervisory liability
- Wrongful death
- Negligence
- Constitutional violations under federal law
The litigation also alleged broader institutional failures, including a history of violence by correction officers and inadequate action by supervisors responsible for preventing abuse.
A separate case filed in the New York Court of Claims asserted state-law allegations, including battery and negligent supervision. The $24 million agreement is expected to resolve both the federal and state civil actions.
What Does the $24 Million Settlement Cover?
Public reporting indicates that New York agreed to pay $24 million to resolve the family’s civil claims. The settlement has been reported as the largest New York civil-rights settlement involving the death of a person in state prison and one of the country’s largest prison wrongful death resolutions.
Settlement figures do not function like court rules. The agreement does not establish a required payment for other deaths in custody, and it should not be used to predict the value of another family’s claim.
Compensation in an individual correctional-death case may depend on:
- The circumstances that caused the death
- The available video and witness evidence
- The deceased person’s age and health
- Medical treatment received before death
- Conscious pain and suffering
- Lost income and financial support
- The effect of the death on surviving family members
- The conduct of officers and supervisors
- The government entities and individuals that may be liable
- Federal and state restrictions on recoverable damages
Our companion guide explains what compensation may be available in a jail or prison wrongful death lawsuit.
Click to contact our personal injury lawyers today
Were Correction Officers Criminally Prosecuted?
Yes. Criminal charges were brought separately from the Brooks family’s civil litigation.
Public reporting states that one officer was convicted of second-degree murder and several other officers pleaded guilty to manslaughter-related charges. The criminal cases concerned whether individual officers committed crimes. The civil cases addressed constitutional violations, wrongful death, damages, and potential responsibility extending beyond the officers who physically struck Brooks.
A criminal conviction can be important evidence in related civil litigation, but a family does not always need a criminal conviction to pursue a civil claim. Civil and criminal proceedings involve different legal claims, burdens of proof, defendants, and possible outcomes.
A family may potentially bring a civil action when:
- No criminal charges were filed
- Criminal charges remain pending
- An officer was acquitted
- An officer pleaded guilty to a lesser offense
- The responsible government agency was not a defendant in the criminal case
The availability and strength of a civil claim must be evaluated independently.
Complete a Free Case Evaluation form now
What Constitutional Rights Do Incarcerated People Have?
People in prisons and jails retain protections under the United States Constitution.
For people serving a criminal sentence, the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. That protection may apply when correction officers use excessive force, knowingly expose someone to a substantial risk of serious harm, or act with deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.
The constitutional standards governing people held in a jail before trial may arise under the Fourteenth Amendment. Because pretrial detainees have not been convicted, the legal standard applicable to their treatment may differ from the standard governing sentenced prisoners.
The U.S. Department of Justice has emphasized that prison officials must take reasonable steps to protect people in their custody when they know those individuals face a substantial risk of serious harm.
Potential constitutional claims after a custodial death may involve:
- Excessive or objectively unreasonable force
- Deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition
- Failure to protect someone from staff or other incarcerated people
- Failure to intervene during an unlawful use of force
- Dangerous restraint practices
- Denial or delay of emergency treatment
- Unconstitutional conditions of confinement
- Supervisory failures
- Inadequate training or discipline
- A government policy, practice, or custom that contributed to the death
Families seeking more information can read Can a Family Sue After a Death Caused by Jail or Prison Staff?.
Can Supervisors Be Held Responsible for a Prison Death?
A supervisor is not automatically liable simply because they oversee an officer accused of misconduct. A civil-rights claim generally requires evidence connecting the supervisor’s own actions or failures to the constitutional harm.
Depending on the jurisdiction and facts, relevant evidence may show that a supervisor:
- Knew about a pattern of officer violence
- Received prior complaints about the staff involved
- Failed to investigate credible allegations
- Tolerated false reports or cover-ups
- Failed to discipline officers with known misconduct histories
- Allowed dangerous practices to continue
- Disregarded warnings about systemic abuse
- Failed to implement necessary training or supervision
In the Brooks litigation, a federal judge reportedly declined to dismiss claims against New York corrections Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello III. The lawsuit alleged that senior officials had received warnings concerning systemic violence and cover-ups within the prison system.
That procedural ruling did not constitute a final determination of liability. It allowed claims against the commissioner to continue before the settlement was reached.
What Is a Section 1983 Claim?
Section 1983 is a federal law that allows people to pursue civil remedies when someone acting under state or local governmental authority violates federally protected rights.
In a prison or jail death case, a Section 1983 action may be brought against correction officers, supervisors, medical personnel, or other officials whose conduct allegedly caused a constitutional violation.
A government entity may sometimes be sued when an official policy, widespread practice, or failure to train caused the violation. A city, county, or department is not necessarily responsible merely because it employed the person accused of misconduct.
State governments and state agencies may also have immunity from certain federal claims. As a result, families may need to pursue different defendants or file separate state-law actions in the proper court.
The defendants, legal theories, available damages, and filing procedures depend on whether the death occurred in a city jail, county detention center, state prison, federal facility, or privately operated institution.
What Evidence Can Matter in a Correctional-Death Case?
Much of the most important evidence may be controlled by the jail, prison, government agency, or medical contractor.
Evidence may include:
- Body-worn camera footage
- Fixed surveillance recordings
- Cell and hallway video
- Use-of-force reports
- Incident reports
- Restraint logs
- Housing and classification records
- Medical and mental-health records
- Emergency-response records
- Autopsy and toxicology findings
- Staff schedules
- Training and disciplinary records
- Prior complaints against involved officers
- Internal investigations
- Communications among officers and supervisors
- Witness statements
- Photographs of injuries
- Policies governing force, restraints, and medical care
Video evidence was particularly important in the Brooks case. The New York Attorney General released the footage as part of an investigation intended to increase transparency.
Evidence can be deleted, overwritten, altered, or lost over time. A family’s attorney may send preservation notices and seek court orders to protect relevant records.
Ben Crump Law Handles Deaths in Custody and Correctional Civil-Rights Cases
Ben Crump Law does not represent the Brooks family in the New York settlement. The firm does, however, represent families in separate cases involving deaths in jails and prisons.
Those matters include:
- Gershun Freeman, who died following an encounter with correction officers at the Shelby County Jail while experiencing a mental-health crisis. Ben Crump Law recently responded to the criminal trial verdict.
- Charles Adair, whose family filed a civil-rights and wrongful death lawsuit concerning his death in the Wyandotte County Detention Center.
- Rolin Hill, whose family alleges in a Virginia Beach correctional-death lawsuit that deputies beat him during a mental-health crisis and failed to provide appropriate medical care.
- Je’Vion Benham, whose family retained Ben Crump Law after his death at Valdosta State Prison and raised concerns about supervision and unsafe housing decisions.
- Christon Collins, whose family filed a federal lawsuit concerning his death at the DeKalb County Jail.
The allegations and claims in those separate cases must be evaluated on their own evidence and procedural status.
Speak With a Jail or Prison Civil-Rights Lawyer
When someone dies in custody, the government agency responsible for the facility may control the video, medical records, witness information, staff histories, and internal reports needed to determine what happened.
Families may face short notice requirements and strict filing deadlines in addition to the statute of limitations. Prompt investigation can be essential to preserving evidence and identifying every potentially responsible party.
Ben Crump Law represents families in civil-rights and wrongful death matters involving excessive force, medical neglect, failures to intervene, unsafe confinement conditions, and other alleged correctional failures.
Call 800-959-1444 for a free case evaluation. There are no attorney fees unless compensation is recovered.
Call or text 800-593-3443 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form
